Skip to main content

Talking Transmissions Part One


There are now essentially four different types of transmissions available in various cars and SUVs and the media isn’t helping with the mixing of terms. This is a summary of their method of transmitting power and the advantages and disadvantages. Whether you want a sports car or the most fuel efficient economy car, this applies to you for a satisfying driving experience.

Part one will discuss the Automatic and the Automated Manual.
First, a brief discussion of gears or “speeds” a transmission may have. There are an increasing number of speeds offered in a transmission. The highest in production is now nine in an automatic for the 2014 Jeep Cherokee and Chrysler 200 (Update: A new 10 speed is shared with Ford and GM). There are a lot of models with eight speed automatics as well as several manual transmission or “stick shift” cars with 7 speed transmissions.

The advantage of more gears is twofold. For the enthusiast it enables optimal acceleration keeping the engine rpm closer to its peak power. This provides quicker acceleration provided the interval between shifts is quick. The other advantage is similar in that the engine can stay in its most efficient rpm range for better fuel economy.

Automatic Transmission
The most common and popular transmission is the Automatic. An automatic uses fluid to transmit power from the engine by way of the torque converter to a series of couplers and gear sets.
The advantages of the automatic are numerous. Of course, the name implies no input needed for shifting. They are also very smooth in operation although they can be manipulated by the vehicle controls for a firmer or softer shift. Shift speeds are can be very quick with little, if any power lost during the shift. It is an excellent transmission for drag racing provided the shifts are firm and the software is optimized for it.

Because of the torque converter, depressing the brake and the accelerator allows for the driver to decide what engine rpm is utilized for an optimized launch within design and software limits. This is called a “brake torque” and it “loads up” the torque converter. This is ideal for consistent and quick launches at the dragstrip.

The disadvantages are added weight and a heavier rotating assembly which used to be, even in modern cars with a lock-up torque converter, a very slight mileage penalty. For the enthusiast, a slight penalty on the dynamometer in terms of power transmitted to the wheels and on racetrack could occur as well.

Advancements in technology have now surpassed the mileage versus the manual transmission in some cars. Service intervals are long and while rare, repairs can be costly due to the complexity of the design with hydraulic lines, mechanical assemblies and electronic controls. While hot
laps can be done with an automatic, the weight, complexity, efficiency, and heat management make it unsuitable for a race car except on the dragstrip. Will the transmission “hunt” frequently trying to find the optimal gear and are the ratios optimized for acceleration or fuel economy?

Naysayers call it an “Auto tragic”. Another slang term is “slushbox” due to the hydraulics and I suspect, some notorious power losses due to inefficient design back in the day. When Chevrolet introduced the new Camaro with less horsepower than the manual, it was ridiculous.

MPG comparison:
BMW 428i 8-speed automatic: 22 city /32 highway; 6-speed manual 20 city /30 highway: Advantage automatic.

Automated Manual
Also known as a dual-clutch transmission or DCT (single clutch units have nearly disappeared with road cars), even professional journalists still refer to the automated manual as an automatic. It’s not a “true” automatic because it doesn’t have a torque converter and the associated limitations of the hydraulics. It is more accurately a manual transmission controlled by electro-mechanical means. The
proper term is an Automated Manual.

The DCT is found in many manufacturers’ cars except domestics (a familiar theme of behind the times). Because the efficiency of a direct mechanical connection like a manual or “stick shift” and shift speeds consistently quicker, more precise and more consisten than a human, it is the transmission of choice in many performance cars. The shift speed and engagement of one clutch while the other disengages means a nearly seamless power delivery. The efficiency and lighter rotating assembly means potentially better mileage than an automatic as well.

Two clutches and computer controlled shifting also imply a long clutch life. The long-term reliability should be excellent, but repairs will be an interesting proposition many years down the road. My guess, like an automatic, by the time a major repair is needed at 200k or 300k miles it’s a moot point anyway.

With shift speeds reported to be .1 to .25 of a second and always a perfect shift, it is no wonder the worlds quickest cars are almost all DCT equipped. Notable exceptions are the Dodge Viper and Chevrolet Corvette Z06/ZR1. Recently Porsche caused an uproar by only offering their excellent
track-focused 911 GT3 with a DCT. Time will tell if it will be offered with a manual transmission (Update: Porsche announced a manual option again).

The beauty of a perfect rev-matched downshift or a consistently .3-.5 second quicker quarter mile time is also compelling. The disadvantages could be considered weight and complexity. Also the “dumbing down” of the driving experience moving further towards autonomy and removing the skill necessary to operate a motor vehicle. Launch-control is a common feature because there is little, if any variance in engine rpm allowed for a dragstrip style launch. This and the aggressive ratios allowed by manual shifting means all-wheel drive cars can have ridiculous acceleration times but with some limitation in driver input. A single-clutch unit tends to be less smooth in low-speed type driving. It also doesn’t spread the wear between two clutches.

MPG Comparison below.  Be sure to check the government site for the latest ratings: https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbsSelect

BMW 335is coupe 6-speed manual 18/26;  7-speed DCT 17/24 Advantage: Manual
Porsche 911 Turbo 6 speed manual 16/24;   7-speed DCT 17/25 Advantage: DCT
Volkswagen Passat Diesel 6 speed manual 31/43;  6-speed DCT 30/40 Advantage: Manual

Automated transmissions obviously differ in intent and results. Continuing with the discussion of transmission, Part Two will cover the Manual and Continuously Variable Transmissions. Be sure to check out more mileage comparisons as well.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sixth generation Camaro V6 review

Chevrolet updated the chassis of the Camaro for 2016 with the new Alpha platform and by all accounts the approximately 250 to 300lb weight reduction was a huge improvement. Despite having a brilliant chassis and three powerful engine choices, the interior and outward visibility hardly improved at all. I wanted to like this car, I really did. It has some really good aspects but overall it’s only good for going in a straight line, not reverse or backing up out of any parking space, on public roads or modified into a track-only car.  You decide if the interior justifies a $29,000 MSRP. The 2017 model is essentially the same. The 335hp V-6 is a great engine, responsive, sounds good and with the quick shifting 8 speed automatic, the car is capable of mid-high 13 second quarter mile ETs. It feels every bit as quick as the numbers suggest. It has no appreciable dead spots and has an excellent pull. The 8 speed auto is finicky on the highway though, downshifting at the slightest provocatio...

Nissan GT-R Review and Test Drive: Part 1 of 2

Click here for Part 2 of 2: Driving the Beast There were quite a few surprises driving the awesome and controversial Nissan GT-R. Having the opportunity to drive one on a twisty mountain road favored by motorcyclists was a thrill. It’s very “mechanical”, quite large and my impression more of a competitor to the Audi R8 than the Porsche 911 Twin Turbo. Background: This 2010 model has about 2000 miles on it. The MSRP was over $80,000. It features a 6-speed dual clutch paddle-shift rear transaxle. The 3.8 liter twin-turbo V-6 produces 485 hp at 6400rpm and 434 ft. lbs of torque at 3200 rpm. Known for consistent deep 3-second 0-60mph blasts and high 11-second quarter mile times, the biggest controversy was the factory reported Nurburgring time of 7:29, beating far lighter, 600 hp plus cars like the Porsche Carrera GT and Pagani Zonda F. The owner has had some notable cars in the past and is no stranger to track days. Cars like a track prepped Acura NSX, two E46 BMW M3s, and an ’04 Porsche ...

The San Francisco Auto Show is rolling at the Moscone Center

The 59 th annual San Francisco Auto show returned this past Saturday, November 19 th through November 27 th at the Moscone Center in downtown San Francisco. Always a bargain to view over 800 vehicles at $10 for adults and children under 12 free. This year expanded further the emphasis on electric, hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles. Test drives are offered with thirty vehicles by six different manufacturers including Mercedes and Fiat. Multiple special guests are scheduled throughout the week such as local sports mascots, the Raiderettes, radio and television personality Gary Radnich and more. The Auto Salon which featured modified cars, trendsetters in an eclectic collection. It is in the south hall on the upper level. The signage needs to be increased, but it’s worth a visit. Yes, there were the broken-axle appearing stanced cars and plenty of lowered sedans, but there are some gems as well. Photography is a bit of a challenge due to the cars being too close together, but it’s a...