Skip to main content

Autonomous Car Implications Part 1

Transportation as we know it will be radically changing in the next few decades. The autonomous automobile is going to forever change the driving arena. This two-part series discusses implications and raises questions and theories of the impact to all of our lives. There are a myriad of issues the public may not have considered before. However, behind the scenes great minds are formulating the technology and procedures to bring this new age of transportation.

The AutoCar/Ecar/iCar will be a fully automated transportation device with a host of external AND internal monitoring systems. Take all this in, and start thinking how the non-AutoCar/Ecar owner will be incorporated and accepted. New rules and operating laws will be written all in the name of safety and efficiency. Current safety concerns will potentially plummet if interface and programming is done correctly. The fatality rate will eventually be below the airline industry. Will all the benefits cause a prejudice against the independent self-drivers? Will law enforcement target self-drivers for possible infractions more often?

Law Enforcement will need far fewer resources tied up with accident responses. Crime will decrease due to crime response improving even with overworked/over budget departments.

Consider the following:
The Car: It will have interior occupant sensors, cameras, GPS and cellular for navigation and emergency purposes, exterior cameras to monitor traffic and electric motors for steering, door opening, etc. There will be plenty of gasoline for many years, but how many internal
combustion cars will be AutoCar/Ecars?

Fully tinted windows will be allowed – because emergency responders will be able to remotely activate bright interior lights and receive occupant counts or even identification via the cameras. Remember, the technology is there, it’s just a matter of adding software code and the equipment.

Will differences in routing be an inconvenience? Recently a route from Google Maps to a BMW navigation system gave two different routes to the same destination. When giving verbal directions, just wait until road, tire and wind noise cause the spoken words to be misunderstood just like they are now with Bluetooth voice dialing.

Ownership: The owner must show authorization to command the car to travel OR provide authorization for a passenger. Will owners charge others with rates less than a taxi? How will that be monitored? Will we have to register our work and home addresses? Will “Big Brother”
monitor the use? Or, will there be an option for income generation for allowing the vehicle to be used for a taxi? How many will take advantage of that and suffer from smokers, litterers, vandals and who knows what else?

Occupant considerations: All occupants, including pets will be required to be safely secured or belted in. At any time a passenger is unbelted the vehicle will immediately slow and pull over to a safe area and come to a stop. All passengers will have emergency button/alarm access. If at any
time the button or alarm is activated, not only will the vehicle come to stop, the authorities will automatically be alerted, contact the vehicle occupants via video conference and know the location of the vehicle via GPS and cellular signals. There will be serious fines for false alerts otherwise they will overwhelm the system due to sheer volume. Remember, eventually we’re talking about millions on the road at any time.

Will drinking and riding be allowed? Not if a driver override would be required. Now a breath analyzer aspect may get incorporated as well and one occupant of legal age will have to be sober. What is the penalty for drinking and riding if caught?

Passenger interaction: Eventually the technology will allow for non-driver interaction. At what point will that be allowed? Right now a front seat passenger must be present. What about special needs vehicles and the elderly? When do they get their personal car use? Weight and biometric sensors
will be in the seats so an occupant cannot nap in the back seat while the AutoCar/Ecar is driving until non-driver interaction is allowed.

Check out the Part 2 article regarding the driving considerations of commuting, city driving, accidents, etc.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ford Mustang GT350 and GT350R review

It’s the exhaust system. It’s an eye widening, amazing mechanical roar, both exotic and muscular at the same time. And that is in the Sport mode. In the standard mode, it’s a quiet cruiser and an excellent grand tourer. Comparisons to the BMW M4 are immediate and inevitable, it is that dialed in. Ford took the already very good Mustang platform and enhanced the suspension and drivetrain, and based on past drives of the current the model, the some interior bits as well. The 2016 Ford Mustang GT350 is Ford’s flat plane crankshaft V-8 answer to the Camaro Z/28 but is absolutely street friendly and less expensive. The non-R version has a starting MSRP $47,995. It features a 5.2 liter V-8 rated at 524hp at 7500 rpm and a healthy 429 lb-ft. torque at 4,750 rpm. The 8000rpm redline makes for a long, hard pull to redline. With the exhaust in the quiet mode, and 80mph cruise is as silent as the BMW 3-series. Styling takes the great lines of the current GT and adds more aggressive touches withou...

The Absurdity of Fastrak and the HOV lanes

The state of California continues with the ridiculous HOV or High Occupancy Vehicle lanes that are intended for Electric Vehicles, hybrids with limited issue permission stickers, motorcycles and multiple occupant vehicles. As you can guess, eventually these lanes won’t move any quicker than other full access lanes. That’s how stupid they are. They are so poorly thought out that there are multiple scenarios that the system can be foiled. Of course, not everyone can use these lanes which I covered in a previous article here: http://cartruthblog.blogspot.com/2016/07/abolish-wasteful-and-unfair-hov-lanes.html so they are patently unfair. Now in the infinite wisdom of CalTrans and others, the Fastrak was introduced in order to charge a fee for solo riders who want to use the lanes. This meant adding sensors to detect vehicles but still no cameras for reading license plates. Of course cameras came next along with a revised Fastrak that has a switch to indicate how many passengers are in the ...

Sixth generation Camaro V6 review

Chevrolet updated the chassis of the Camaro for 2016 with the new Alpha platform and by all accounts the approximately 250 to 300lb weight reduction was a huge improvement. Despite having a brilliant chassis and three powerful engine choices, the interior and outward visibility hardly improved at all. I wanted to like this car, I really did. It has some really good aspects but overall it’s only good for going in a straight line, not reverse or backing up out of any parking space, on public roads or modified into a track-only car.  You decide if the interior justifies a $29,000 MSRP. The 2017 model is essentially the same. The 335hp V-6 is a great engine, responsive, sounds good and with the quick shifting 8 speed automatic, the car is capable of mid-high 13 second quarter mile ETs. It feels every bit as quick as the numbers suggest. It has no appreciable dead spots and has an excellent pull. The 8 speed auto is finicky on the highway though, downshifting at the slightest provocatio...