Skip to main content

Modifying an SUV to be the safest possible family vehicle

I received a very thought provoking letter from a reader in Miami, Florida asking about the safest possible family vehicle. Readers, what are your thoughts?

Dear Rob,
My name is Diego, and I stumbled on to your post about vehicle height precisely researching on vehicle safety. My wife is pregnant and two months away from giving birth. My baby girl is not even born yet and I'm already a very overprotective father! As soon as I found out she was pregnant I bought her a Chevrolet Equinox, IIHS top safety in the SUV department. The other day I was thinking and I figured that there are trucks and SUVs out there that are a lot
larger than my wife's SUV.

So with the intent on my future princess being extremely well protected from the ever-so-common-in-Miami car accidents I want to buy and modify the safest vehicle I can. I was thinking on the lines of buying a Ford Excursion for its very large size and mass, maybe lifting it a few inches but also widening its stance to prevent the rollover risk and then going on to have it fitted with the same solid steel front and rear bumpers seen in many off road and work vehicles, also have it fitted with any kind of extra support for the roof columns, internal door supports etc. After reading your post, I've also considered implementing large heavy duty brembo brakes for stopping power. So my questions to you are:
1) On equal terms will a vehicle with a greater mass be safer to passengers in the event of an accident?
2) What car, and what modifications would you recommend to me? I want to either buy or build the safest family vehicle out possible, money is not an issue at all, price of the vehicle or how much it costs to have a shop modify it is not a factor.

Thank you for your attention and I apologize if the email is longer than just a question, but I did want you to know what was on my mind so you could have a background to work on! Thanks again and have a great day! I’ll be awaiting your response!

Sincerely,  Diego

Hello Diego,
I certainly understand being overprotective! I’ll cover each of the points you raised. Keep in mind potential compromises as these topics are vetted. For overall size and rugged build, an SUV is the obvious choice. Also keep in mind it isn’t just accident survivability, but also accident avoidance by handling, braking, driver skill and decision making.

1. A vehicle with greater mass may be safer in an accident, especially against a lighter vehicle. However, drawbacks are potentially increased stopping distance and an adverse effect on emergency handling. Secondary to your points, fuel efficiency, brake and tire wear and if a larger vehicle, practical maneuverability; are all negatively effected.

While I could initially recommend a crew-cab heavy duty pick-up truck, braking distances are sub-par and emergency handling is very poor. The overly large size is restrictive for parking, service, etc. Finally, with a curb weight of 3 tons or more, I can’t even speculate on the cab roll-over protection the vehicle weight works against.

2. Regarding modifications, this can be a tricky proposition depending upon the vehicle. I always recommend opting for the sport package because performance oriented upgrades mean better handling, upgraded tires for better grip (handling and braking), and overall heavier duty components.

A tire and wheel upgrade package would likely be as effective as larger brakes for a well engineered vehicle. Larger brakes don’t necessarily mean a shorter stopping distance, but rather better repeated braking performance and less wear. A significant weight increase would also justify larger brakes. Evasive driving also justifies a larger brake package.

Raising a vehicle will have an adverse effect on handling, potentially braking and increase rollover risk. Widening the stance with spacers, assuming they can be found for an SUV can help minutely provided there is room without protruding past the fenders. You don’t want to overly stress components and void a warranty on a highly capable yet heavy SUV.

Structural reinforcements can have benefits, but have negatives too. A reduction of a crush zone increases the g-forces on occupants by reducing the deceleration time after impact. Cabin reinforcements can be very costly and roll bars must be heavily padded or cause greater injury than without. My suggestion would be to contact a vehicle modification company such as O’Gara since this is their specialty as well as for firearm resistance, another important consideration.

Some rare safety features that offer superior occupant protection are self-contained seat belt and seat assemblies. This is an expensive engineering feat. A five-point racing harness is an excellent safety modification but requires expert incorporation and replacing existing seats. Another feature is an airbag incorporated into the seatbelt. This was recently observed in the 2014 Ford Explorer Sport, an impressive SUV.

A capable, safe and performance oriented SUV is my recommendation. There are good SUVs and there are great SUVs. I would choose from the highest performance versions of the BMW X5, Porsche Cayenne, Mercedes M, G or GL class or Land Rover because of their fantastic driving dynamics for an SUV and heavy duty construction. If you wish to modify beyond what is offered, I recommend contacting O’Gara and Canepa Design since they can offer expert consulting based on their modification experience and enhance whatever you choose.

Finally, the most important aspect of occupant safety is the driver. I highly recommend performance and tactical or emergency situation driver training for your wife and yourself. All the structural reinforcements and accident avoidance capacity are null and void if the driver makes poor choices, panics and hesitates. Extreme braking, acceleration, slalom maneuvers, obstacle avoidance, J-turns, etc. should all be in your ability with confidence. This is the most important part of occupant safety.

Good luck and keep me posted on your choice and send pictures!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sixth generation Camaro V6 review

Chevrolet updated the chassis of the Camaro for 2016 with the new Alpha platform and by all accounts the approximately 250 to 300lb weight reduction was a huge improvement. Despite having a brilliant chassis and three powerful engine choices, the interior and outward visibility hardly improved at all. I wanted to like this car, I really did. It has some really good aspects but overall it’s only good for going in a straight line, not reverse or backing up out of any parking space, on public roads or modified into a track-only car.  You decide if the interior justifies a $29,000 MSRP. The 2017 model is essentially the same. The 335hp V-6 is a great engine, responsive, sounds good and with the quick shifting 8 speed automatic, the car is capable of mid-high 13 second quarter mile ETs. It feels every bit as quick as the numbers suggest. It has no appreciable dead spots and has an excellent pull. The 8 speed auto is finicky on the highway though, downshifting at the slightest provocatio...

Nissan GT-R Review and Test Drive: Part 1 of 2

Click here for Part 2 of 2: Driving the Beast There were quite a few surprises driving the awesome and controversial Nissan GT-R. Having the opportunity to drive one on a twisty mountain road favored by motorcyclists was a thrill. It’s very “mechanical”, quite large and my impression more of a competitor to the Audi R8 than the Porsche 911 Twin Turbo. Background: This 2010 model has about 2000 miles on it. The MSRP was over $80,000. It features a 6-speed dual clutch paddle-shift rear transaxle. The 3.8 liter twin-turbo V-6 produces 485 hp at 6400rpm and 434 ft. lbs of torque at 3200 rpm. Known for consistent deep 3-second 0-60mph blasts and high 11-second quarter mile times, the biggest controversy was the factory reported Nurburgring time of 7:29, beating far lighter, 600 hp plus cars like the Porsche Carrera GT and Pagani Zonda F. The owner has had some notable cars in the past and is no stranger to track days. Cars like a track prepped Acura NSX, two E46 BMW M3s, and an ’04 Porsche ...

The San Francisco Auto Show is rolling at the Moscone Center

The 59 th annual San Francisco Auto show returned this past Saturday, November 19 th through November 27 th at the Moscone Center in downtown San Francisco. Always a bargain to view over 800 vehicles at $10 for adults and children under 12 free. This year expanded further the emphasis on electric, hybrid and alternative fuel vehicles. Test drives are offered with thirty vehicles by six different manufacturers including Mercedes and Fiat. Multiple special guests are scheduled throughout the week such as local sports mascots, the Raiderettes, radio and television personality Gary Radnich and more. The Auto Salon which featured modified cars, trendsetters in an eclectic collection. It is in the south hall on the upper level. The signage needs to be increased, but it’s worth a visit. Yes, there were the broken-axle appearing stanced cars and plenty of lowered sedans, but there are some gems as well. Photography is a bit of a challenge due to the cars being too close together, but it’s a...